A study published in Educational Psychology examines how different approaches to rewarding pupils affected their spelling scores and prosocial behaviour for different ability levels.
A total of 1,005 pupils, ages 9 and 10, in 28 classes were
recruited from three primary schools in Singapore. Classes were randomly
assigned to one of five reward conditions: competitive, cooperative,
individualistic, cooperative-competitive, and cooperative-individualistic. An
ABABA (A= implementation, B = withdrawal) design was used for each condition,
and pupils’ spelling scores were tracked over a period of 10 weeks. Teachers
were asked to rate pupils’ prosocial behaviour before and after the study.
The results showed that the different conditions did affect pupils’
spelling scores and prosocial behaviour, but that these effects depended on
ability level, such that different conditions were more effective for different
ability levels. Across all five
conditions, only the cooperative-competitive condition resulted in increased
spelling scores and prosocial behaviour across all three ability groups, with
these improvements maintained when the intervention was withdrawn. In the
cooperative-competitive condition, pupils cooperated as a group and the group
with the highest average spelling score (compared to other groups) was
of reward pedagogy on spelling scores and prosocial behaviors in primary school
students in Singapore (October 2019), Journal
of Educational Psychology
A new PISA study has been published, responding to the question of whether today’s 15-year-olds are acquiring the problem-solving skills needed in the 21st century. The study presents results from the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving, which was administered on computer to about 85,000 teenagers in 44 countries and economies.
Singapore, Korea, and Japan top the performance table. However, England, which is often cited as “underperforming” in international tests, is 11th, with pupils performing significantly better in problem solving, on average, than pupils in other countries who show similar performance in mathematics, reading, and science.
In general boys outperformed girls in problem solving, and the study also found that the impact of socio-economic status on problem-solving performance is weaker than it is on performance in mathematics, reading, or science.
Source: PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V) (2014), OECD.
A new review from the National Institute of Education in Singapore has explored evidence-based pedagogical approaches related to the use of Web 2.0 technologies in both schools and higher education settings. Web 2.0, which is also known as the read-write web, allows two-way communication between a website and users.
The review suggests that actual evidence regarding the impact of Web 2.0 technologies on pupil learning is fairly weak, though generally positive. However, positive effects are not necessarily attributed to the technologies per se but to how the technologies are used.
The review included empirical studies that examined the impact of Web 2.0 technologies on learning, excluding anecdotal studies and studies only focusing on pupil self-reported data and interviews.
Source: Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in K-12 and Higher Education: The Search for Evidence-based Practice (2013), Educational Research Review, 9.
East Asian countries dominate international standardised tests in mathematics. This new working paper, produced by the Institute of Education, compares English children with those from Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, to see how their performance changes between the ages of 10 and 16.
The results suggest that, although average maths test scores are higher in the East Asian countries, the achievement gap does not increase between ages 10 and 16. The conclusion is that policy makers should concentrate on reforms at pre-school and primary level if English children are to catch up. Although they do not believe that reforming secondary education is the answer, the authors do note that there is also a need to ensure that English high achievers manage to keep pace with the highest achieving pupils in other countries during secondary school via, for instance, gifted and talented schemes.
Source: The Mathematics Skills of Schoolchildren: How Does England Compare to the High Performing East Asian Jurisdictions? (2013), Institute of Education
Using findings from an OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) study on the impact of socio-economic background on pupil performance this report from the Department for Education summarises how the social attainment gap in England compares with other countries.
It looks at:
- How the OECD measure pupils’ socio-economic backgrounds in PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment);
- The distribution of pupil attainment in England and how this compares with countries internationally;
The association between pupils’ socio-economic backgrounds and attainment in England and how this compares with countries internationally;
- How social gaps reported in PISA compare to the gap reported between pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and their peers in England; and
- How average attainment reported by PISA is affected when we control for pupil background.
One of the findings of the report is that England is not the only country in which socio-economic status has a high impact on attainment. This is also true for some high-performing PISA participants, in particular, New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, and Belgium.
Source: PISA 2009: how does the social attainment gap in England compare with countries internationally? (2012), Department for Education