Mixed results for maths and science programmes

New reports from the US What Works Clearinghouse review the research on three programmes designed to improve pupil achievement in maths and science. Findings were as follows:

  • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies, a peer-tutoring programme for primary pupils that aims to improve pupil proficiency in maths and other disciplines, was found to have no discernible effects on mathematics achievement.
  • Carnegie Learning Curricula and Cognitive Tutor, a secondary maths curriculum that offers textbooks and interactive software to provide individualised, self-paced teaching based on pupil needs, was found to have mixed effects on mathematics achievement.
  • GEMS The Real Reasons for Seasons, a curriculum unit for pupils aged 11–14 that focuses on the connections between the Sun and the Earth to teach the scientific concepts behind the seasons, was found to have potentially negative effects on general science achievement.

Sources: Peer-assisted learning strategies (2013), What Works Clearinghouse
Cognitive learning curricula and cognitive tutor (2012), What Works Clearinghouse
Great Explorations in Math and Science (GEMS) The Real Reasons for Seasons (2013), What Works Clearinghouse

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *